109: (Default)
[personal profile] 109
WHAT SHOULD INVESTORS do about this week's elections, in which control of Congress went to the Democratic party for the first time in a dozen years?

I suppose the first thing is to say "Thanks" to the guys who got booted from office on Tuesday. Be grateful — it's been a nice run for investors since the Democrats lost control of Congress in 1994.

The compound annual total return for the S&P 500 over those 12 years was 11.3%, compared with an average of 10.3% over previous history. Inflation only eroded your winnings at an average annual rate of 2.6% during those 12 years, compared with 3.1% over previous history.

So "Thanks." We investors got to make more money than usual, and what we made was safer from inflation.

But now voters have decided to give the other team a chance at bat. Seems odd, since today about 55% of voters are direct owners of stocks, either in brokerage accounts, IRAs or 401(k)s.


вовремя я из US stocks переложился в foreign.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-11 02:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] edbook.livejournal.com
a lot of the profit for investors came from the workers losing jobs or wages and benefits, companies outsourcing work outside the country, and liquidation of assets. Only 55% of voters having investments is a shame and is not an accurate picture of investors. I'm in that increment of the population even though my investments are about $6.USD... yes, only six dollars. Most jobs have IRAs and 401's etc because it's a way employers can participate less in retirement funding.

The big reason for the big change had to do with the fact that the American people are finally catching on to the lies, corruption, and cowtowing to big business controlling the government instead of government listening to the people who they're supposed to be representing.

The Democrats didn't win, the Republicans lost.

Peace

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-14 02:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 109.livejournal.com
I quoted it just to show there is an opposite point of view on the elections outcome. Because everybody else seems to be ecstatic, quickly forgetting that one of the strongest accusations against democrats when they lost majority last time was... corruption.

Me personally, I thought Bush had to be impeached after New Orleans tragedy. It was an absolute failure, nothing could demonstrate any clearer that the administration is unable to perform even core duties.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-12 07:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anton-solovyev.livejournal.com
За что "thanks", за "инфляцию", которая не учитывает выросшие в N раз дома, медицину, топливо и колледж? За работы, уплывшие в Индию с Китаем?

А не пойти ли этим "аналитикам" в жопу? Или, точнее, в Саудовскую Аравию или куда еще, где командуют фашики.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-14 02:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 109.livejournal.com
эти аналитики - это premium content, а то бы я ссылку дал. их политические аспекты ваще не волнуют, а за правильный прогноз экономических аспектов им платят немеряное бабло. так штаа... у меня есть все основания доверять их экономическому прогнозу больше, чем, например, твоему.

Profile

109: (Default)
109

March 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
101112131415 16
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags